Hadrian

Glossary

What is a confession of judgment (COJ)?

A confession of judgment (COJ) is a contractual provision in which a borrower or merchant pre-authorizes a creditor to obtain a court judgment without notice or a trial if the debtor defaults. In MCA, COJs were widely used to enable rapid collection; legislative changes in New York and other states have significantly restricted their use against non-resident debtors.

How COJs work

A confession of judgment clause in an MCA agreement means the merchant, by signing the agreement, authorizes the funder's attorney to appear in court and confess judgment against them — without the merchant being served, appearing, or having an opportunity to contest the claim before judgment is entered. The funder can then immediately enforce the judgment, including wage garnishment, bank levies, and liens on property.

COJs dramatically reduce the time and cost of collections for funders. From the merchant's perspective, they provide essentially no procedural protections — the judgment exists before the merchant knows about it.

Current legal landscape for COJs in MCA

New York historically permitted COJs and was a common filing jurisdiction for MCA funders nationwide. Following regulatory scrutiny and legislative action beginning in 2019, New York restricted COJs to prohibit their use against non-resident defendants — a change that significantly reduced their utility for MCA funders because most merchants are not New York residents. Other states have varying COJ rules; some prohibit them entirely, some permit them with restrictions. As of 2026-06-16, the enforceability of COJ provisions varies significantly by jurisdiction — verify current law with qualified counsel.

FAQ

Confession of Judgment (COJ) — common questions

Are confessions of judgment still used in MCA agreements?

Some agreements still include COJ provisions, though their utility is substantially narrowed by New York's 2019 restrictions and variations in other states. Funders should evaluate whether COJ clauses in their agreements are actually enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction — an unenforceable provision provides false security.

What alternatives do funders have for rapid collections without a COJ?

Alternatives include arbitration clauses with emergency relief provisions, UCC enforcement against collateral, and standard litigation — though each is slower or more costly than a functioning COJ. The practical shift has been toward stronger pre-funding underwriting and stacking detection rather than relying on post-default remedies.

Related

Merchant cash advance (MCA) UCC filing Reconciliation (MCA)

The institution around the intelligence

See Hadrian run your case lifecycle — intake to close, every decision audited.

Governance-native case processing for lenders and regulated teams.

Book a live demo

The enforceability of confession of judgment provisions is a highly jurisdiction-specific and actively evolving legal question. This is educational information only — not legal advice. Consult qualified counsel on the enforceability of COJ provisions in your agreements and the relevant jurisdictions before relying on them.